🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the first European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant regression for gender equality.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties advocating for the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has urged the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both inside the country and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has announced a demonstration for next Thursday, charging lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the legislation for further consideration if he has concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics announced on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, rather than belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular legal protections for survivors of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence comparable discussions in other EU countries